低风险投资之路(巴菲特致股东的信在线阅读)
内容导航:
Q1:理财的书哪本适合初学者
《小狗钱钱》《财富自由之路》《巴比伦最富有的人》《低风险投资之路》等等
Q2:急求实际点的小投资低风险的赚钱方法?
基金定投金额在:最低100~200元每月;最高可以50000元每月。有的银行对某些基金设定了最低门槛。
工行基金定投协议分三年期、五年期和八年期。别的银行没有。只要你的基金定投协议没有到期和终结、只要你的银行卡上每月按时有足够的扣款金额,那么基金定投就会一直下去的。卡上余额不足,则定投失败。连续三个月扣款失败,则定投协议自动终止。
你不想定投了两种方法:第一种就是上面的连续三个月停扣款,定投协议自动解除;第二种办法就是办理解除基金定投协议。
办理了定投解除协议后,基金账户里的基金市值仍旧存在,并会每天随着市场变化而变化,除非你办理赎回手续,全部赎回,那就没有了。
还有就是如果你没有办理解除定投协议或没有连续三个月停扣款,虽然你赎回了你的基金,只要你卡上有足够的余额,定投还是会每月继续扣的。
ok
Q3:投资低风险小的生意?大神们帮帮忙
分析一下,什么生意你最适合做。你擅长的,自然就是你容易收获的。创业首先要定位自己和市场的。根据你的特点选择致富之路,道理都一样,勤奋、专著!如果会成功。那必定在升出的价值里包含了你的辛苦。 要把握好你的社会关系,当然是利用上关系。如果没有太多关系,一般都是消费者忠实度比较高的行业,不容易受到关系的影响难以介入。包括,餐饮、娱乐、生产等行业。 如果你要做个体,那校园小店、2元店、饮食业,是当今小投资见效最块的快的行业。而且大小比较灵活。资金多了可以扩大。资金小的话夜市、地摊几乎不要什么投资。当然,还可以选择网络开店. 实说真的 要做生意赚钱,先去多多磨练,实践工作,或是去帮别人打打工什么的,这样自己有了经验,有了信心你就有了创业的动力了!那时 船到了桥头 就会直的。 在互联网飞速发展的今天,传统的生意之道也必须随着时代的变化而改变: 以我个人的经验来看,创业需要弄清下面两个问题: 1、 你想做的是什么? 2、 你能做的是什么? 你想做的最好是你喜欢的,这样你才会有源源不断的动力推动你前进。大部分人不成功不是因为选错行业而是因为中途放弃。如果你每天都硬着头皮去做自己不喜欢的事,恐怕结果不会太乐观。 所谓你能做的是结合你的天赋、能力、经验和资金来考虑的。不着边际的或超出你个人能力的事最好别做,因为我们是小本创业,经不起太大的风险。虽说跌倒了可以爬起来,但更多的人是跌倒了再也爬不起来,无奈之下只得又给别人打工。无论何时都不要忘记结合市场需求及相应的消费群体,否则只能是纸上谈兵,出师未捷身先死。 在我们选项前,下列的几点是我选择行业的若干原则: 1、 必须是喜欢的产品,能够不断保持激情;产品及所在行业 有广阔的前景,产品是不断增值的 2、 所选行业及产品要有个性,只与一部分人群做生意即可;可以复制并可以做大 3、 能发挥自己的天赋和特长 4、 现款交易 5、 少和政府部门打交道,少接触饭局、歌舞厅 6、 穿休闲装的时间更多 7. 朝阳产业,成长性高 ,能长期发展 8.受人尊敬,有行业成就感 9.有一定区域垄断性,我的地盘我做主,避免低层次的竞争 10.苦点累点没关系,但投资不能太大,滚动发展 以上所列的条件未免太过完美,但我们要知道,老板是这个世界上风险最高的职业,如果你要选择这个职业,一定要先由己出发,缜密思考精心筹划,这样胜算比较高,存活的几率也比较大。活下来才有可能赢,才有可能一步步朝着大老板、大生意的目标努力、前进。 兄弟,你这个问题,每个人都在想,每个人都想知道。但是你知道么,。一个会赚钱,聪明的人,吃过苦的人不会在问这个问题了。你也许还很迷惘。不知道怎么赚钱好。其实嘛。行行出状元。这个世界上这么多人,这个中国这么大。其实什么都缺的。财不入急门,成功的真理时刻摆在面前,那就是:吃得苦中苦,方为人上人! 中国是农业大国。很多食品需要加工,如果你有钱,推荐去,要有创新。要健康。再次强调不要违法。```` 这些都是我个人的想法,最吃香的行业就是吃苦的行业。
Q4:80多万的资金 现在买什么股票好呢
2000多只股票里面,真正值得投资的不超过20只。我个人偏向价值投资,选择股票的话首,首先不选新股、创业板、中小板,这些公司多不成熟;倾向大盘蓝筹,在这些股票里面选择业绩稳定盈利的股票(非国资企业),然后再从剩下的股票里面找由于丑闻、政策或者经济环境导致暂时被市场错杀的股票(也就是跌幅较大的股票),放入自选股。每天看盘,理解这些股票的行情,寻找机会建仓。
每个人的个性不同,操作风格也会不同,找准一条适合你自己的投资之路,非常重要!建议新手不要急于入市,先多学点东西,可以网上模拟炒股(推荐游侠股市)先了解下基本东西。
说的比较笼统,一家之言,仅供参考。
Q5:Mork:1990年巴菲特致股东的信:为什么买入富国银行
"With Wells Fargo, we think we have obtained the best managers in the business, Carl Reichardt and Paul Hazen. In many ways the combination of Carl and Paul reminds me of another - Tom Murphy and Dan Burke at Capital Cities/ABC. First, each pair is stronger than the sum of its parts because each partner understands, trusts and admires the other. Second, both managerial teams pay able people well, but abhor having a bigger head count than is needed. Third, both attack costs as vigorously when profits are at record levels as when they are under pressure. Finally, both stick with what they understand and let their abilities, not their egos, determine what they attempt. (Thomas J. Watson Sr. of IBM followed the same rule: "I'm no genius," he said. "I'm smart in spots - but I stay around those spots.")
Our purchases of Wells Fargo in 1990 were helped by a chaotic market in bank stocks. The disarray was appropriate: Month by month the foolish loan decisions of once well-regarded banks were put on public display. As one huge loss after another was unveiled - often on the heels of managerial assurances that all was well - investors understandably concluded that no bank's numbers were to be trusted. Aided by their flight from bank stocks, we purchased our 10% interest in Wells Fargo for $290 million, less than five times after-tax earnings, and less than three times pre-tax earnings.
Wells Fargo is big - it has $56 billion in assets - and has been earning more than 20% on equity and 1.25% on assets. Our purchase of one-tenth of the bank may be thought of as roughly equivalent to our buying 100% of a $5 billion bank with identical financial characteristics. But were we to make such a purchase, we would have to pay about twice the $290 million we paid for Wells Fargo. Moreover, that $5 billion bank, commanding a premium price, would present us with another problem: We would not be able to find a Carl Reichardt to run it. In recent years, Wells Fargo executives have been more avidly recruited than any others in the banking business; no one, however, has been able to hire the dean.
Of course, ownership of a bank - or about any other business - is far from riskless. California banks face the specific risk of a major earthquake, which might wreak enough havoc on borrowers to in turn destroy the banks lending to them. A second risk is systemic - the possibility of a business contraction or financial panic so severe that it would endanger almost every highly-leveraged institution, no matter how intelligently run. Finally, the market's major fear of the moment is that West Coast real estate values will tumble because of overbuilding and deliver huge losses to banks that have financed the expansion. Because it is a leading real estate lender, Wells Fargo is thought to be particularly vulnerable."
-------BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. Chairman(Warren Buffet)'s Letter
Q6:《巴菲特致股东的信:股份公司教程》书哪里下载
没多大意思,每有一本书,是直接买来换钱的!
建议问题人,多做研究!
Q7:复利投资有哪些,如何复利理财
目前各银行及三方卖的各类宝,也就是货币基金,都是复利,也就是每天的收益直接转换为份额再生息。
本文由锦鲤发布,不代表本站立场,转载联系作者并注明出处:/showinfo-3-49308-0.html